Past Seminar Papers
As we find our lives increasingly intermixed with technologies that are advancing, in large part, beyond our control, many moderns are pursuing ‘the question concerning technology’. In doing so, they are often led to Martin Heidegger, arguably the best philosopher of the 20th century. However, when approaching Heidegger, I argue that one must understand the deep apocalypticism that underlies his thought, and especially his reflections on technology. Only by doing so, I suggest, can we grasp the full implications of eerie insights.
As this paper seeks to show, one’s view of the nature of man can greatly influence the interpretation of historic events. By attending to the diverse foundations of both Machiavelli and Guicciardini's political thinking, in regards to the nature of political people and their passions, I argue that these evaluations necessarily influence their treatment of a consequential moment in Florentine political history – that of the Savonarolan Moment. Consequently, by reflecting on the diverse evaluations of this time, one can consider the nature of apocalyptic moments throughout all political times.
In this paper, I attempt to articulate the twofold character of regulating political ambition in an “uncorrupt” republic. By focusing on Livy and Plutarch’s presentation of Manlius Capitolinus and Furius Camillus, two exemplars of aristocratic ambition in the early Roman republic, and, in turn, Machiavelli’s reinterpretation of these actors, I hope to show how regulating political ambition is done both by institutions and cultural practices as well as those individuals who desire distinction. By seeing this, I argue, we may then be able to begin to understand how ambition is to be regulated in Machiavelli’s new order.
To see more or discuss possible work let's talk >>
Carl Schmitt, the controversial German legal theorist, has some prescient insights into liberal self certainty and its dangers. As 2016 has passed and we are moving towards a more uncertain future, it will be increasingly important to understand the thrust of Schmitt’s liberal critique in order for us to think towards the future of a modern world that will inevitably be ‘political’. Accordingly, in this paper, I investigate Schmitt's early critique of liberalism in regards to its focus on economic and technical concerns.
For copies of these papers, please reach out via email.